Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stovall v. Stumbo

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 24, 1984Published

1DissentWilhoit, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. I believe the following statement found in the opinion of the Workers’ Compensation Board takes a realistic approach to this case and that the Board’s result in this respect does not violate either statute or case law:

[A]n employee, although adjudicated permanently and totally disabled and fully compensated therefore (sic), may thereafter acquire a wage earning capacity. If he then suffers a subsequent injury which deprives him of such newly acquired wage earning capacity, he may be entitled to compensation for such loss.

Our courts have long…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Inland Steel Co. v. MosbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964
  2. Yocom v. HaydenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API