Legal Opinion

Orzel v. Szewczyk

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 11, 2009No. 1-08-2240PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson

In order to decide this legal malpractice case the jury first had to decide another case. That other case is referred to as a “case within a case.” Plaintiff Krystyna Orzel sued defendants Conrad Szewczyk, James Kash, and Kash & Szewczyk, P.C., alleging legal malpractice in an underlying slip and fall negligence case. The jury found in defendants’ favor.

On appeal, plaintiff contends: (1) she was entitled to a judgment notwithstanding the verdict; (2) she was entitled to a new trial because the verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence; (3) the jury was improperly instructed to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Maple v. GustafsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Tri-G, Inc. v. Burke, Bosselman & WeaverIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Kohler v. Woollen, Brown & HawkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Osborne v. KeeneyKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Wilbourn v. CavalenesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  3. ILLINOIS DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICES v. PorterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  4. Calloway v. Bovis Lend Lease, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  5. Union Planters Bank, N.A. v. Thompson Coburn LLPAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API