Mendez v. State

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Contrary to the appellant’s contentions, we conclude that the contents of a BOLO which stated that a distinctive automobile, “a 1981-83 burgundy Cadillac with a continental kit” carrying two white males, had been involved in an armed robbery a short time before and a short distance away from the point that a similar vehicle was stopped by the police, provided ample “founded suspicion” which constitutionally justified the stop. See Hetland v. State, 387 So.2d 963 (Fla.1980); State v. Delgado, 402 So.2d 41 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); State v. Gamble, 370 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA…