Legal Opinion

Clark v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 17, 2003No. A03A2327PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

After being tried on a multi-count indictment, David Clark was convicted of two counts of aggravated assault, three counts of armed robbery, and one count each of burglary, kidnapping with bodily injury, and simple kidnapping. Following denial of his motion for new trial, Clark appeals. He contends that the trial court erred or abused its discretion in failing to excuse Jurors 9 and 11 for cause. We disagree and affirm.

There are two types of challenges to an individual juror for cause: (1) for principal cause, and (2) for favor. Challenges for principal cause are based on facts…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. Hutcheson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. Kim v. WallsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  5. Walls v. KimCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HauserIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Holloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Elliott v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. Remillard v. Longstreet Clinic, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API