Legal Opinion

Yanes v. Sowards

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1999No. 98-0047PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue here is whether the trial court abused its discretion by dismissing a juror whose grandfather was ill and not expected to live, and proceeding with only eleven jurors. We hold that it did not. We therefore reverse the court of appeals’ judgment and render judgment that respondent take nothing.

Mollie and G.A. Sowards sued Hector O. Yanes, M.D., alleging that Yanes operated on the wrong artery during Mollie’s coronary artery bypass surgery. During the second day of testimony, juror Christopher Obregon notified the trial court that his grandfather was in the hospital dying from an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. YarbroughTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Carrillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. PeralezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Woodward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  5. Allen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Graves, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
  2. In re M.G.N.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Summit MacHine Tool Manufacturing Corp. v. Great Northern Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  4. Doreatha Walker v. Hitchcock ISD, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
  5. In Re Graves, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API