Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sorensen v. Columbus State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1933No. 28310PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

This is an action in equity by Bertha Gross, intervener, to impress a trust in her favor in the amount of $145 upon the assets of the Columbus State Bank, an insolvent institution. In the district court judgment was given for the intervener, and the receiver, a representative of the depositors, who are the real parties in interest, appeals.

The facts making up the transaction out of which the litigation arises are not substantially in dispute, and embrace the following: Miss Gross, a teacher of the Columbus city schools, in payment of salary received a school warrant, of which the following is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bartley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State v. Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Farmers Bank v. Johnson, King & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Witte v. BrozNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Bartley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Sorensen v. Nebraska State Savings BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API