Legal Opinion

McGrath v. Dockendorf

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided December 15, 2016No. Record 160262PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY JUSTICE STEPHEN R. McCULLOUGH

**836 We resolve in this appeal whether the "heart balm" statute, Code § 8.01-220, bars an action in detinue for recovery of an engagement ring following the breakoff of the engagement. We conclude that the heart balm statute does not bar such an action, and, therefore, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

On August 25, 2012, Ethan L. Dockendorf proposed to Julia V. McGrath. She accepted. He offered her a two-carat engagement ring worth approximately $26,000. In September 2013, after the relationship deteriorated, he broke off the engagement. The parties never married.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Matthew v. HermanSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
  2. Lee v. SpodenSupreme Court of Virginia · 2015
  3. Dodson v. Potomac MacK Sales & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  4. Zedd v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  5. Pavlicic v. VogtsbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lambert v. Sea Oats Condo. Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2017
  2. Chamberlain v. Marshall Auto & Truck Ctr., Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2017
  3. William Elam, III v. Stephen EarlyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025
  4. Charles C. Pattillo, Jr. v. Alison PattilloCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API