Legal Opinion

Cisneros v. Kim

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 23, 2002No. 01-55250; BAP No. CC-00-01123-MoPBPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Appellant Arturo M. Cisneros, trustee of Jin E. Kim’s Chapter 7 bankruptcy estate, appeals from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s determination that the debtor’s employee retirement plan funds were fully exempt from the bankruptcy estate under California law. Because the relevant date for determining the status of exemptions is the petition date,1 we affirm for the reasons stated by the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in its published opinion in Cisneros v. Kim (In re Kim).2

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cisneros v. Kim (In Re Kim)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. In Re Muriel Nash Reaves, Fka Muriel Adams Reaves, Debtor. William Little v. Muriel Nash ReavesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cogliano v. Anderson (In Re Cogliano)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Wilson v. Arkison (In Re Wilson)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. Sticka v. Casserino (In Re Casserino)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Bendon v. Reynolds (In Re Reynolds)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Gose v. McGranahan (In Re Gose)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API