Legal Opinion

In Re Lindh

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1961No. 9318PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

This appeal is from an order of the Fifth Juvenile District Court of .Grand County committing Carl Everett Lindh, age 16, to the State Industrial School. 1

The burden of this appeal is that appellant was not afforded due process of law because neither he nor his parents were given adequate notice of the purpose of the hearing at which his previously granted probation was revoked and the order of commitment issued.

Appellant cites and relies on State v. Bonza, 2 which sets forth the requirements of due process in -relation to revocation of probation. That was a criminal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mill v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1907
  2. In Re PoffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1955
  3. State v. BonzaUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Maxie Leroy Pee v. United States of America, James E. Curtis v. United States of America, Leroy S. Johnson v. United States of America, Gordon A. Magruder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ginn v. Superior Court, in and for County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  2. State in Interest of LGWUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Velasquez Ex Rel. Velasquez v. PrattUtah Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State, in Interest of AtchesonUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Dimmitt v. City Court of Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API