Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Adney

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided April 29, 2005No. ARMY 20030048Published

1DissentClevenger, Judge

I dissent.

In a 24 January 2003 memorandum, “SUBJECT: Waiver of Forfeitures, U.S. v. Adney,” the convening authority, Brigadier General Kamiya, wrote:

1. I have received your request, dated 16 January 2003, to waive the adjudged forfeitures announced as part of PFC Adney’s court martial sentence until I take final action on this case and to waive the automatic forfeitures under Article 58b(b) for six (6) months.

2. I have considered the factors contained in both RCM 1101(e)(3) and (d)(2). Your request to defer the adjudged forfeitures is granted. Additionally, I direct that execution of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  2. United States v. ZimmerArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
  3. United States v. Paz-MedinaArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API