Legal Opinion

Moses v. Ford Motor Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1946No. Docket No. 54, Calendar No. 43,268PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

As I construe the department's finding and award, the holding is that plaintiff suffered a personal injury which would have entitled him to compensation except "for the reason that he has not suffered any disability as the result of such injury." Obviously the purpose of the department's determination is to enable plaintiff to be later awarded compensation in event his injury results in disability. Otherwise there was no need for the department to modify the award of the deputy who denied compensation, one of the reasons being that "prompt notice of said hernia was not given to the employer."

R…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Riley v. Berry Bros. Paint Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Barclay v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Caufield v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Amamotto v. J. Kozloff Fish Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API