Legal Opinion

MacHt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 21, 1994No. 93-3274PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

642 So.2d 1137 (1994)

John MACHT, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 93-3274.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

September 21, 1994.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Mallorye G. Cunningham, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. Tallahassee, and Ettie Feistmann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

2Per curiam

We affirm appellant's conviction and sentence.

The specific error claimed here is that the trial court allowed the jury to view a transcript — which was not "properly authenticated" — of a tape recording…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. Grimes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  3. Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. Stanley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martinez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  3. Commerford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Howard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API