Legal Opinion
United States v. Joseph Marren and Michael Russo
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 29, 1989No. 88-2997, 88-3044PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
Michael Russo and Joseph Marren, along with three others, were charged in a 27-count indictment filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois with conspiracy to violate the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) (count 1), conspiracy to commit tax evasion (count 24), use of the telephone to promote a prostitution business (counts 2-23), and filing false federal income tax returns (counts 25-27), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), § 371 and § 1952, and 26 U.S.C. § 7201, respectively. Marren was named only in the two…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- United States v. Michael J. McNeese and Laura ConwellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. James GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Kojo Sababu, Jaime Delgado, and Dora GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Alexander Cooper and Anthony Davis, Also Known as "Future"Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Alex Beverly, Betty McNulty George Brown and Diane GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.