Legal Opinion

California Coastal Commission v. United States Department of the Navy

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 28, 2014No. Case No. 13cv0178 JM(JLB)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JEFFREY T. MILLER, District Judge.

Plaintiff California Coastal Commission (“CCC”) moves for summary judgment on its claim that the Federal Defendants’ decision not to conduct a supplemental consistency determination under the Coastal Zone Management Act (“CZMA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1451 et seq., is arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 701-706. The United States Department of the Navy (“Navy”) and Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus, in his official…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Occidental Engineering Company v. Immigration And Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Japanese Village, LLC v. Federal Transit AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. In re HarwoodUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2014
  3. Floyd v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, LLC.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
  4. Jorge Navarette-Leiva v. Christopher Chestnut, in his official capacity, Warden of California City Detention Facility, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API