Legal Opinion

Estate of Sleeter v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Tax Court

Decided September 11, 1974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carlisle B. Roberts, Judge.

Plaintiff appealed from the Department of Revenue’s Order No. IH 73-14, assessing additional inheritance taxes. The plaintiff contends that the mere possibility of receipt by the decedent’s widow of social security benefits at age 60 should not be included, at its “present” (or any) value, in the net estate of the deceased and, therefore, should not be taxed under ORS 118.010 (1) and 118.150 (3) and (4). In the alternative, the plaintiff alleges that the benefits, if any, should be valued and taxed at the time of future payment as prescribed in ORS 118.220.

The facts…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Richardson v. BelcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Plummer v. ColerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Poulsen v. HoffOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Eugene Theatre Co. v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of Seitz v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1975
  2. Jayne v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1975
  3. Bray v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API