Hogan v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Hogan v. State, No. 160 of the 2018 Term, Opinion by Moylan, J. UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF A FIREARM – CONTENTIONS – FACTUAL BACKGROUND – A TOPSY-TURVY THRESHOLD – THE COMPETENCY HEARING – STATE V. HICKS – A. THE 180-DAY RULE – B. REQUEST FOR A COMPETENCY EVALUATION – C. THE CRITICAL HICKS POSTPONEMENT – D. “GOOD CAUSE” FOR THE POSTPONEMENT – E. WHEN DEFENDANT AND DEFENSE COUNSEL DISAGREE – F. THE 180-DAY RULE IN THIS CASE – SIXTH AMENDMENT SPEEDY TRIAL – A. DISTINCTION BETWEEN 180-DAY RULE AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT – B. A MULTI-FACTORED ANALYSIS – C. LENGTH OF DELAY – D. REASON FOR THE DELAY – A…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.