Legal Opinion

Hogan v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 29, 2019No. 0160/18Published

1Opinion of the Court

Hogan v. State, No. 160 of the 2018 Term, Opinion by Moylan, J. UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF A FIREARM – CONTENTIONS – FACTUAL BACKGROUND – A TOPSY-TURVY THRESHOLD – THE COMPETENCY HEARING – STATE V. HICKS – A. THE 180-DAY RULE – B. REQUEST FOR A COMPETENCY EVALUATION – C. THE CRITICAL HICKS POSTPONEMENT – D. “GOOD CAUSE” FOR THE POSTPONEMENT – E. WHEN DEFENDANT AND DEFENSE COUNSEL DISAGREE – F. THE 180-DAY RULE IN THIS CASE – SIXTH AMENDMENT SPEEDY TRIAL – A. DISTINCTION BETWEEN 180-DAY RULE AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT – B. A MULTI-FACTORED ANALYSIS – C. LENGTH OF DELAY – D. REASON FOR THE DELAY – A…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API