John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Casey
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Per curiam
This appeal raises the question whether the district court, after approval of a petition under Chapter X of the Chandler Act, 52 Stat. 840, 883, 11 U.S.C.A. § 501 et seq., has power to take possession of mortgaged premises, collect the rents and enjoin the mortgagee from interfering therewith by foreclosure or otherwise.
As was stated by the Circuit Court of Appeals in the Second Circuit, in the case of In re Franklin Garden Apartments, Inc., 2 Cir., 1941, 124 F.2d 451, 454, since the decision in Continental Illinois Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co., 294 U.S. 648, 675, 55…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- In Re Franklin Garden ApartmentsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Tuttle v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Colonial Realty Investment Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- First Nat. Bank in Houston, Texas v. LakeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
- John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1943
- Joe M. Flournoy v. City Finance of Columbus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.