Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Christopher Stephen Beckman v. Lloyd Arnold, Ron Neal, Arron Jonas, Alicia Wildfang

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided July 21, 2026No. 3:25-cv-00373Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION CHRISTOPHER STEPHEN BECKMAN, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:25-CV-373-JD-JEM LLOYD ARNOLD, RON NEAL, ARRON JONAS, ALICIA WILDFANG, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Christopher Stephen Beckman, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a complaint. ECF 1. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 94

(2007) (quotation marks and citations omitted).…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. John Stephen Rowe and Dr. Jeffrey L. Lant v. Michele Shake, Greg Hulse, Craig HanksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  4. Perry L. Scott, Sr., Michelle M. Scott, Phillip H. Scott, Jr. v. Rodney L. Edinburg and Village of Glenwood, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Gonzalez v. FeinermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API