Legal Opinion
Weisenthal v. Pickman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 11, 1989PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), entered July 1, 1988, which, upon the defendants’ motion made at the close of the plaintiff’s case for judgment as a matter of law, is in favor of the defendants and against her dismissing the complaint.
*850Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, and a new trial is granted.
The evidence adduced by the plaintiff was legally sufficient to permit the trier of fact to infer that the defendants owned and had control over a stairway…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gordon v. American Museum of Natural HistoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Gramm v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- Kelsey v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Gramm v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
3Cited by70 opinions
- Padula v. Big V Supermarkets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Gloria v. MGM Emerald Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Gonzalez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Quarles v. Columbia Sussex Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Erikson v. J.I.B. Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.