Legal Opinion

Majestic Mfg. Co. v. Majestic Electric Appliance Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 7, 1949No. 10731PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant, plaintiff below in a suit for trade-mark infringement and unfair competition, appeals from a judgment of dimissal upon a record which shows little or no controversy in the controlling facts recited by the court in its memorandum opinion and here summarized.

The appellant for more than SO years has manufactured coal and gas stoves and ranges and a limited number of related items. It had, before the last war, fabricated electric plates that were to be used in connection with some of its coal and wood ranges, and had applied to them, as to its stoves and ranges, its trade-mark…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Aunt Jemima Mills Co. v. Rigney & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  3. France Milling Co. v. Washburn-Crosby Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Continental Motors Corporation and Continental Aviation and Engineering Corporation v. Continental Aviation Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. The J. B. Williams Company, Inc. v. Le Conte Cosmetics, Inc., and Elton C. Toland and Lenore TolandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. New West Corp. v. NYM Co. of California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. Sunbeam Lighting Co. v. Sunbeam CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  5. General Motors Corp. v. Cadillac Marine & Boat Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API