Legal Opinion

Wheelmaxx Inc. v. Mahal

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 29, 2024No. 1:22-cv-01506Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 WHEELMAXX INC. doing business as Case No. 1:22-cv-01506-KES-SKO WHEELMAXX OFF ROAD AND TIRE 10 REPAIR, LUBEMAXX LUBE AND OIL, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION WEST COAST TIRES & AUTO CENTER, 11 THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR and WEST COAST TIRES & TRUCK DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE GRANTED IN 12 CENTER, PART 13 Plaintiff, (Doc. 21) 14 v. OBJECTIONS DUE: 21 DAYS 15 MARAAJ SINGH MAHAL, an individual; AMERICAN TIRE & AUTO REPAIR 16 CENTER, INC., a California corporation, 17 Defendant. 18 _____________________________________/ 19 On…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API