Wheelmaxx Inc. v. Mahal
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 WHEELMAXX INC. doing business as Case No. 1:22-cv-01506-KES-SKO WHEELMAXX OFF ROAD AND TIRE 10 REPAIR, LUBEMAXX LUBE AND OIL, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION WEST COAST TIRES & AUTO CENTER, 11 THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR and WEST COAST TIRES & TRUCK DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE GRANTED IN 12 CENTER, PART 13 Plaintiff, (Doc. 21) 14 v. OBJECTIONS DUE: 21 DAYS 15 MARAAJ SINGH MAHAL, an individual; AMERICAN TIRE & AUTO REPAIR 16 CENTER, INC., a California corporation, 17 Defendant. 18 _____________________________________/ 19 On…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.