Barnes v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Appellant Barnes sued the District of Columbia for false arrest and false imprisonment, and although the jury awarded him nominal damages of one dollar plus attorney’s fees up to $500, the trial court, consistent with its earlier rulings, entered judgment for only one dollar. Appellant now contends that the court erred not only in ruling that he could not recover attorney’s fees incurred or loss of earnings suffered while defending the underlying criminal actions, but also in denying a motion for mistrial based on the court’s refusal to admit evidence of these damages. We affirm.
I
On March…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Broughton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Marshall v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Lyle Tatum v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Secretary, Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Hallman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- S. H. Kress & Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Parker v. SteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Phillips v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Ross v. Sheriff of Lafourche ParishLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- Nnadili v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Sacchetti v. Gallaudet Univ.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.