Legal Opinion

Risner v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 14, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op .the Court by

Judge Logan

Reversing.

The appellant was charged by indictment in the Floyd circuit court with the offense of selling vinous, malt, and intoxicating liquors or beverages. The indictment charges that he sold ‘‘spirituous, vinous,-malt and intoxicating liquors or beverages to Hi Higgins.”

The evidence took a wide range, and was not confined to efforts to prove that he- had sold intoxicating liquors- to Higgins, but- it dealt with whether he had sold such liquors- to any one within 12 months before the finding of the indictment. There was no objection- to either the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Deaton, Haddix and White v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  2. Wilson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Louisville & N. R. v. Falls City Ice & Beverage Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. Vanmeter v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. Commonwealth v. RigoCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API