Legal Opinion

Robert Earl Adams v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided May 20, 2014No. 14-12-00768-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING 1

KEM THOMPSON FROST, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Robert Earl Adams, challenges the trial court’s assessment of a specific amount of court costs against him in the trial court’s judgment following his plea of “guilty” to an indictment charging him with the offense of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance. On original submission, this court applied its own precedent to the issues in this appeal and affirmed the trial court’s judgment after deleting the specific amount of court costs assessed in that judgment. Six days after our opinion on original submission…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson, Manley DewayneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  2. Manley Dewayne Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
  3. Cardenas, Jose JuanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  4. Jose Garza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  5. Rogers, Louis DouglasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Justin Tirrell Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Willis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. Dunkan Thomas Boyce v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2015
  4. Hollis Lane Willingham v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2023
  5. Jacob Joseph Romo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API