Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Szerlip v. Goldfogle

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Certiorari to review assessments.

1Opinion of the CourtCallaghan, J.

This proceeding cannot be considered from the standpoint of inequality of assessments as the petition does not allege or the proof show any inequality within the rule of law governing such cases. It is not sufficient to show a lower assessment, as was done here, of property adjoining two of the parcels under review. People ex rel. Fiske v. Feitner, 95 App. Div. 217. Is the assessment higher than the market value of the property? The market value must be determined by the price for which a willing owner would sell and a willing purchaser would buy. The usual disagreement of experts on value…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  2. People ex rel. Fiske v. FeitnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  2. Central New York Mortgage & Title Co. v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1935
  3. People ex rel. Rayland Realty Co. v. CantorNew York Supreme Court · 1924
  4. People ex rel. Sebring v. DowdNew York Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API