(HC) Christensen v. Judge in the State of California
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHAD ANDRE CHRISTENSEN, No. 2:23-cv-2846 DJC SCR P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 JUDGE IN THE STATE OF CALIF., 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a county inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas 18 corpus and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases 19 requires the court to make a preliminary review of each petition for writ of habeas corpus. Pro se 20 habeas corpus petitions should be liberally…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Yarborough v. GentrySupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Nelson v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.