Legal Opinion

(HC) Christensen v. Judge in the State of California

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 9, 2024No. 2:23-cv-02846Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHAD ANDRE CHRISTENSEN, No. 2:23-cv-2846 DJC SCR P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 JUDGE IN THE STATE OF CALIF., 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a county inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas 18 corpus and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases 19 requires the court to make a preliminary review of each petition for writ of habeas corpus. Pro se 20 habeas corpus petitions should be liberally…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Yarborough v. GentrySupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Nelson v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API