Curtis v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Chief Judge.
Here, the defendant is undisputedly mentally ill and mentally disabled to an extent that he is incompetent to stand trial. It is likewise undisputed-and the trial court found-that he will never recover and become competent. Under these cireumstances, we find that it was a violation of his right to due process to deny his motion to dismiss the criminal charges pending against him.
Appellant-defendant Alva Curtis brings this interlocutory appeal, arguing that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to dismiss and discharge the criminal proceedings against him.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Habibzadah v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
3Cited by5 opinions
- Curtis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- Matlock v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Denzel v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. J.S.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. JSIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010