Legal Opinion

Miqueas Ten v. Svenska Orient Linen, and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant v. Nacirema Operating Co., Inc., Third-Party

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 31, 1978No. 547 and 548, Dockets 77-7413 and 77-7450PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the dismissal of a complaint by a longshoreman against a shipowner and employer for failure to prosecute. The District Court also denied appellant’s motion under Rule 60(b), F.R.C.P., to vacate the dismissal. We reverse.

The plaintiff originally brought an action in the New York Supreme Court to recover damages for injuries which he sustained on September 12, 1972; while working as a longshoreman in the employ of Nacirema Operating Co., Inc. aboard defendant-appellee’s M/S LAKE EYRE. The action was removed to the United States District Court by petition dated November…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edward Davis v. United Fruit Company, Defendant-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  2. Frederick Michelsen v. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  3. Derek Lamb v. Globe Seaways, Inc., and Maritime Overseas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Monahan v. WashburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Ten v. Svenska Orient LinenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  3. Monahan v. WashburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  4. Putric v. KijakaziDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API