Legal Opinion

Burns v. Broderick

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1931Published

1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.

One claim made by the plaintiff is that the patented process Colprovia, for which a bid was submitted, is untried and experimental. The selection of a pavement is a matter for the municipal authorities, and when the selection is not abused and there is no evidence of fraud or illegality, the choice of the municipal authorities will not be disturbed. In this instance the claim that Colprovia is untried and experimental is disputed by *860affidavits submitted in opposition to the motion for a temporary injunction, and there is no evidence of fraud or illegality in the selection of this pavement as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Warren Brothers Co. v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Holly v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API