Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1994No. 96265, (Calendar No. 5)Published

1Opinion of the Court

447 Mich. 93 (1994)

523 N.W.2d 310

MURPHY

v.

MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY

Docket No. 96265, (Calendar No. 5).

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued January 11, 1994.

Decided August 31, 1994.

Rapaport, Pollok, Farrell & Waldron, P.C. (by Steven J. Pollok and Kassia L. Snyder), for the plaintiff.

Lacey & Jones (by Michael T. Reinholm) for the defendant.

RILEY, J.

Today we are called upon to consider the duration of the total dependency presumption in cases involving minors entitled to death benefits under § 321 of the Worker's Disability Compensation Act. The language of the statutes at issue makes clear…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. House Speaker v. State Administrative BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Franks v. White Pine Copper DivisionMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Dussia v. MONROE CTY. EMP. RET. SYS.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Dussia v. Monroe County Employees Retirement SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API