Legal Opinion

Mapes v. Brown

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1884PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion by defendants to strike out an amended summons and complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtLawrewce, J.

It is undoubtedly true that the. plaintiff could hot amend the summons without an application to the court (see Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 723, 727). This was the rule under the-old Code (see 1 Waits Practice, 490), where it is stated that the power of amending once as Of course, conferred on parties to an action by’section 172 of the. Code, relates tó pleadings and not' to process. The various casés under the old Code upon this subject are also there collected. The amended summons was therefore irregular ; but I see no reason for striking it out, inasmuch as the defendants who make this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hollister v. LivingstonNew York Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barnes v. BlakeNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Wadsworth v. GeorgerNew York Supreme Court · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API