Blodget v. Detroit Safe Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts, and points of counsel passed upon by the Court, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This is an action of assumpsit on the common counts, and the declaration contains two special counts for breach of warranty in the sale of a fire-proof safe.
The first special count alleges as the contract broken that—
“The said defendant undertook, and then and there faithfully promised the said plaintiffs, that the said safe was in good condition, and made of the best material, and in a workman-like manner, and then was, and would continue to be, a safe and proper protection of plaintiffs’ property.”
The second special count alleges as defendant’s promise that—
“ The said defendant undertook,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Little v. G. E. Van Syckle & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Cook v. DarlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Randall v. J. A. Fay & Egan Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Richardson v. MessinaMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Tufts v. VerkuylMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.