Legal Opinion

E. A. Moore Furniture Co. v. Prussing

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 14, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Creditor’s Bill.—Order appointing a receiver without notice. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Murray F. Tuley, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gaby

delivebed the opinion op the Couet.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order, granted without notice, appointing a receiver of the assets of the appellant.

The bill stated a case which—as to material facts to be considered on this appeal—may be condensed as follows:

December 8,1893, James E. Moore and William J. Moore were the sole partners of a furniture firm, and then, not in the firm name, but individually, made five promissory notes, each for $2,500, payable to their own order, which they indorsed to the appellee.

On one, becoming due in six months thereafter, the appellee obtained…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Durand & Co. v. Gray, Kingman & CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. McIntire v. YatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Gullickson v. MadsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Singer & Talcott Stone Co. v. WheelerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1880
  5. Nusbaum v. Locke & HuleattAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. First State Bank of HillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929
  2. In re Nashville Laundry Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API