Wilridge v. Capitol Manufacturing Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
I! SAUNDERS, Judge.
This appeal arises out of a peremptory exception of prescription granted by the trial court in favor of the appellee, Harseo Corporation (Harseo).
Appellant, Byrian Wilridge, claims that the trial court erred in finding that his claim has prescribed and further in refusing to allow the introduction of claims filed against and on behalf of Capitol Manufacturing Company.
Harseo claims that an otherwise timely suit filed against Capitol Manufacturing Company, a division of Harseo Corporation, did not interrupt prescription against 12Harsco since Wilridge intentionally withheld…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ray v. Alexandria MallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
- Morris v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- John Bailey Contr. v. St., Dept. of Tr. & Dev.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- Abercrombie v. VP PIERRET REALTY & CONST. CO.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Morris v. Westside Transit LineLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- In re Succession of BaileyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011