Legal Opinion

Freeman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 26, 1930No. 13565PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is burglary; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of twelve years.

The evidence is circumstantial but sufficient to support the verdict. Very material and important testimony is that of J. H. Williams, who did not testify in person but whose testimony as given in the examining trial at which the appellant was present, was reproduced. The reception of the evidence was opposed upon the ground that there was no sufficient predicate for the introduction of the reproduced testimony. The sufficiency of the bill of exception is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cline v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. Hobbs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Porch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. Soderman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frangias v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  2. Frangias v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Halbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API