Legal Opinion

J. T. Faragason Co. v. Pitts

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 2, 1926Published

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

— Plaintiff brought suit to recover an alleged balance of $1255.70 due it for money advanced defendant on certain con signments of cotton. Defendant, by bis answer and counterclaim, charged plaintiff with failure to exercise due diligence in the sale of the cotton shipped to it as a cotton factor; that if plaintiff had sold said cotton within a reasonable time after it received same or if plaintiff had sold said cotton when defendant demanded that it do so, that defendant would have due him over and above the amount which he had drawn and all other expenses, the sum of $2,382.50; for which he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moffitt v. HerefordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  2. Phillips v. ScottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
  3. Columbian National Bank v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. F. G. Barton Cotton Co. v. VardeleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Guest v. FarleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1853

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API