I.H. v. J.T.

The plaintiff-appellant’s sole issue in this appeal is that the trial court’s finding of nonpaternity is contrary to law.

We affirm.

A review of the testimony favorable to the defendantappellee shows that the plaintiff testified that she and the defendant had sexual relations three times during February of 1973. She further testified about her subsequent pregnancy and the birth of a baby on November 16, 1973.

The defendant testified he had, in fact, had sexual relations with the plaintiff but denied any such conduct from November, 1972 through November, 1973. He also testified as to her use of…