Sanders v. Construction Equity, Inc.

OPINION ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING

GAULTNEY, Justice.

Both appellants and appellee have filed motions for rehearing. We consider appel-lee’s motion first.

On Motion for Rehearing appellee essentially makes two arguments: First, ap-pellee claims that RCLA does provide a complete liability scheme; second, appellee claims that since appellants’ third amended petition does not plead exemplary damages and the parties did not address the issue, we exceeded our authority in addressing the issue. We write further to provide additional explanation.

Preemptive Effect of RCLA: Appellee urges this court to…