Legal Opinion

Meredith v. Lochrie

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 13, 1905PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Ciarle District Court. — ■ HoN. H. M. TowNER, Judge. Suit to recover for the use of land. There was a judgment for the defendants, from which the plaintiff appeals.—

1Opinion of the Court

SheewtN, C. J.—

There were three mortgages on the land in question. The first one was foreclosed, and the defendants herein, who were the holders of the second mortgage, redeemed therefrom, and took a sheriff’s deed for the land in November, 1899. They thereafter brought suit against the holder of the third mortgage, he not having heen made a party to the foreclosure of the first, and on the 6th day of April, 1900, a decree was entered fixing the amount to be paid by Johnson, the third mortgagee, to make redemp-' tion, and giving him until August 6, 1900, to pay the same. The plaintiff, as the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spurgin v. AdamsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  2. Ten Eyck v. CasadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  3. Barrett v. BlackmarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  2. McPherson v. Camden Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Panama Savings Bank v. ArkfeldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  4. Cataldo v. CompianoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  5. Michigan Idaho Lumber Co. v. Northern Fire & Marine InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API