Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 1, 2008PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated March 16, 2007, which granted the motion of the defendant City of New York pursuant to CPLR 3012 (d) to extend the time to appear and answer, and to compel the plaintiffs to accept its verified answer.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the motion of the defendant City of New York pursuant to CPLR 3012 (d) to extend the time to appear and answer, and to compel the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schonfeld v. Blue & White Food Products Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Trimble v. SAS Taxi Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Yonkers Rib House, Inc. v. 1789 Central Park Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by6 opinions
- Moore v. DayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Feder v. Eline Capital Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Avenue C Med., P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Mid-Hudson Props., Inc. v. KleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Stavola v. BoddAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.