State v. Deschambault
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1DissentWilliamson, C. J.
I would hold the indictment sufficient in law and overrule the exceptions.
Serious problems raised by demurrers to indictments for cheating by false pretenses under R. S., c. 113, § 11 are evidenced in three cases decided this day; namely, State v. Deschambault (3811), State v. Binette, and the instant case. The difficulties have arisen, as I see it, not from differing views upon the general principles of law but from their application to the indictments before us.
In reaching the conclusion that the indictment is sufficient, I have in mind the following reasons:
*220First: Common ordinary words in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. MillsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1840
- Commonwealth v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- State v. AlbeeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957
- State v. Maine State Fair Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953