Legal Opinion

Baltes v. Armour Leather Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1919No. 9,824PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Dekalb Circuit Court; Dan M. Linlc, Judge. Action by Armour Leather Company against Michael Baltes and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtEnloe, J.

This was an action by appellee to recover of and from the appellants the amount of a certain indebtedness then owing, and theretofore contracted by the Cushion Heel Shoe Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Indiana, with the appellee herein. The appellants had been directors of said corporation at the time the grievances complained of were committed.

The complaint was brought under the provisions of §5.104 Burns 1914,' §3868 R. S. 1881, and, among other things, alleged the due organization of said corporation; that its capital stock was $200,000; that at the time of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Patterson v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Brown v. ClowIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Bachman v. CooperIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Getz v. CloughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API