Legal Opinion

Daw v. Vreeland

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1879PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The right of the complainant to call and examine the defendant, Adrian Vreeland, who is sued in a representative capacity, as a witness for him, is denied by the defendants. The act “ concerning evidence” (Rev. p. 378) provides that, in all civil actions, in any court of record in this state, the parties thereto shall be admitted to be sworn and give evidence therein when called as witnesses by the adverse party in such action, but that no party shall be sworn in any case where the opposite party is prohibited by any legal disability from being sworn as a witness, or either of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lindner v. FIRST NAT. BANK & TR. CO. OF MONTCLAIRNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API