Legal Opinion

Federico v. Ragusa

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided June 26, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This is a petition to establish a draft report Appellants, the defendants below, by their report allege that the trial judge was in error in denying their motion to remove a default and by awarding damages in an amount greater than that sought before the default.

The trial judgedisallowedadraftreportforthereasonsthatcertainclaimsoferror were not seasonably raised,3 that the report is “vague and contains several non-*94related matters" and that it is not conformable to the facts as presented to the court and contains extraneous and inappropriate matter.4 Such disallowance came five days after the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pollack v. KellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Diletizia v. MerowitzMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1990
  2. Ford v. Doulos-AyersMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API