Legal Opinion

Keenan v. Harkins

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Prom the circuit court of Leake county. Hon. John B. Enochs, Judge. Keenan and others, appellants, petitioned the board of supervisors at its December term, 1902, to vacate an order made by the board at its May term, 1902, adding certain territory to a stock-law district; Harkins and others opposed the petition, and the board of supervisors denied the same; appellants, petitioners, appealed from the board to the circuit court, and that court having decided against them, they…

Read the full summary

Prom the circuit court of Leake county. Hon. John B. Enochs, Judge. Keenan and others, appellants, petitioned the board of supervisors at its December term, 1902, to vacate an order made by the board at its May term, 1902, adding certain territory to a stock-law district; Harkins and others opposed the petition, and the board of supervisors denied the same; appellants, petitioners, appealed from the board to the circuit court, and that court having decided against them, they appealed to the supreme court.

1Opinion of the Court

Whiteield, C. J\,

delivered the opinion of the court;

The board of supervisors has ordinarily no power to review or reverse or vacate its own judicial action after final adjournment. This case falls within none of the exceptions. Am. & Eng. Enc. Law (2d ed.), vol. 7. p. 1008.

Affirmed.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tally v. Board of Supervisors of Smith CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Board of Suprs. Calhoun Co. v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Moore v. Bd. of Suprs. of Prentiss Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1928