Legal Opinion

GARNSEY v. Buice

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 22, 2010No. A10A1339PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHIPPS, Presiding Judge.

Zachary Buice obtained a 12-month protective order against his neighbor, Tom Garnsey, whom Buice contended was stalking him and his family. On appeal, Garnsey challenges the issuance of the protective order and specific terms therein. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

OCGA § 16-5-94 (d) authorizes a court to grant a protective order “to bring about a cessation of conduct constituting stalking.” Such an order may, among other things, “[djirect a party to refrain from such conduct” or “[o]rder a party to refrain from harassing or interfering with the other.” We review…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pilcher v. StriblingSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  2. Sinclair v. DalyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Thornton v. HemphillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. De Louis v. SheppardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Johnson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Elgin v. SwannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  2. Gabriel Bodi v. Kerrie RyanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API