Silsby v. Frost
Washington Territory
Error to the District Court holding terms at Olympia. Second District. The opinion of the court states all the material facts.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Jones
The contention in this case grows out of these facts:
Plaintiff alleges in his complaint that on September 1, 1885, one Yincent was indebted to him in the sum of $59.05, for goods sold to and used by him in the logging business, in Thurston county, in securing a certain boom of logs then in the water ready to tow; which boom of logs was then of value sufficient to pay said and all debts incurred by Yin-cent in securing the same. That appellant (defendant below) was a creditor at that time of said Yincent, and on that day bought the boom of logs of him, and in consideration of the sale thereof…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Gilmore v. Skookum Box FactoryWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- State v. KimballCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Johnson v. ShueyWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Gay v. SchaeferWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Mitchell v. MathesonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.