Legal Opinion

Salisbury v. Scott

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1810PublishedCited by 5 opinions

J. V. D. SCOTT moved for a reference of this cause, on the usual affidavit.

1Per curiam

Where a motion to refer a cause, is repelled, on the ground that questions of law will arise on the examination of the cause, the party must state what the points of law are, so that the court may judge whe'-her they are material or difficult, and will necessarily arise ; and that we may be satisfied whether the referees be a proper tribunal for the trial of the cause ; otherwise, by the general affidavit, all references may be preV vented.

*3301 he motion is denied, with costs to abide the event oí , the suit,

Motion denied.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dewey v. FieldNew York Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Cass v. CassNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Hibbard v. Commercial Alliance Life InsuranceThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1893
  4. Hibbard v. Commercial Alliance Life InsuranceThe Superior Court of New York City · 1893
  5. Patterson v. StettauerThe Superior Court of New York City · 1875