Legal Opinion · Concurrence

North Carolina v. Pearce

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 23, 1969No. 413Published

1Concurrence

Mr. Justice Douglas, whom Mr. Justice Marshall joins,

concurring.

Although I agree with the Court as to the reach of due process, I would go further. It is my view that if for any reason a new trial is granted and there is a convic*727tion a second time, the second penalty imposed cannot exceed the first penalty, if respect is had for the guarantee against double jeopardy.

The theory of double jeopardy is that a person need run the gantlet only once. The gantlet is the risk of the range of punishment which the State or Federal Government imposes for that particular conduct. It may be a year to 25…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API