Legal Opinion
A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 19, 1992No. 20-1437Published
1Opinion of the Court
960 F.2d 1020
60 USLW 2642, 22 U.S.P.Q.2d 1321, 35
Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 505
A.C. AUKERMAN COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
R.L. CHAIDES CONSTRUCTION CO., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 90-1137.
United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.
March 31, 1992.
Rehearing Denied May 19, 1992.
Gerald P. Dodson, Townsend & Townsend, San Francisco, Cal., argued for plaintiff-appellant (Roger L. Cook and David L. Bilsker, on brief).
Thomas E. Schatzel, Law Offices of Thomas E. Schatzel, Santa Clara, Cal., argued for defendant-appellee.
Lawrence A. Hymo, Cushman, Darby & Cushman, Washington, D.C., argued for amicus…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited103 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.